Agenda and minutes

Apologies had been received from Councillor Robin Judith Cooper with Councillor Eddie Lavery  substituting.

Councillor John Hensley declared a personal and prejudicial interest in items 14 & 15 – Brunel University, Kingston Lane, Hillingdon/Land Fronting Eastern Gateway Building, Kingston Lane, Hillingdon as he was an academic Advisor to the University. He left the room and did not take part in the decision of these items. He also declared a personal interest in item 26 (PART 2).

Councillor Janet Duncan declared a personal interest in items 12 & 22, Tesco Store, Glencoe Road, Hayes, as the application site was in her ward. She remained in the room and voted on these items. She also declared a personal and prejudicial interest in item 26 (PART 2).

Councillor Brian Stead declared a personal interest in items 14, 15 and 16– 47 Brunel University, Kingston Lane, Hillingdon/Land Fronting Eastern Gateway Building, Kingston Lane, Hillingdon/Bishopshalt School, Royal Lane, Hillingdon, as the application sites were in his ward. He remained in the room and voted on these items. He also declared a personal interest in items 24, 25 and 26 (PART 2).

Councillor Wayne Bridges declared a personal interest in item 17 - 24 Sutton Court Road, Hillingdon, as he had submitted a Member’s enquiry regarding the business. He left the room and did not take part in the decision of this item. He also declared a personal interest in item 26 (PART 2).

Councillor Robin Sansarpuri declared a personal interest in items 19 – 166 Pasadena Close, Hayes, as the application site was in his ward. He remained in the room and voted on this item. He also declared a personal and prejudicial interest in items 26, 28, and 29 (PART 2)

Councillor Dominic Gilham declared a personal interest in item 23, 3 Ashley Court, High Street, Yiewsley, as the application site was in his ward. He remained in the room and voted on this item. He also declared a personal interest in item 26 (PART 2).

Councillor Neil Fife declared a personal interest in item 26 (PART 2).

Councillor Eddie Lavery declared a personal interest in item 26 (PART 2).

Councillor Mo Khursheed who was in attendance at the meeting declared a personal interest in items 6 and 7 – Hayes Swimming Pool, Botwell Lane, Hayes and 7 Nestles Avenue, Hayes, as he was a Ward Councillor of the application sites. He also declared a personal interest in item 26 (PART 2).

Councillor Brian Stead was nominated as Vice-Chairman of this meeting; it was seconded and on being put to the vote was agreed.

The minutes of the meetings held on 17 April 2012 were agreed as a correct record and signed by the Chairman.

There were no matters notified in advance or urgent.

It was confirmed that all business marked part 1 would be heard in public and all items marked in part 2 would be considered in private.

Redevelopment of site to provide 72 residential units with associated access, amenity space, landscaping and car parking, including demolition of existing swimming pool (Outline application with details of access, layout and scale only) 

Recommendation :Deed of Variation to S106 Agreement agreed at Committee on 12^th October 2010 and 2^nd November 2010.

Redevelopment of site to provide 72 residential units with associated access, amenity space, landscaping and car parking, including demolition of existing swimming pool (Outline application with details of access, layout and scale only). 

Recommendation 5, third line after the word ‘the’ was amended to read ‘Head of Planning, Sport and Green Spaces’ and after ‘application’ the word ‘may’ was deleted.

Recommendation 6, second line after the word ‘the’ was amended to read ‘Head of Planning, Sport and Green Spaces’.

The recommendation was moved, seconded and on being put to the vote was agreed. 

Resolved

1.         That the Applicant being the Local Authority and being the only legal entity with an interest in the Land which is the subject of this

            application, and hence being unable to enter into a section 106

            Agreement with the Local Planning Authority, completes a Statement of Intent to secure the following planning obligations and which shall bind and require any future purchaser of the Council’s interest in the site to enter into a Section 106 Agreement with the Council:

i)                    The submission of a 10-year Green Travel Plan and that the section 106 agreement is to include a £20,000 bond or a remedial payment measure in the case of a breach. The Travel Plan is to make provision for the inclusion of a car club if it is deemed viable.

ii)                  At least 11% of the scheme is to be delivered as affordable housing. The final tenure and mix is to be agreed with the Council’s Housing department.

iii)                A contribution of £212,005 towards local education facilities.

iv)               A contribution of £28,717.44 towards Health and Social Care.

v)                 A contribution of £20,000 towards public realm/town centre

enhancements.

vi)               A contribution of £30,000 towards local community facilities.

vii)             A contribution of £3,048.41 towards library books and equipment.

viii)           A contribution of £5,000 towards air quality monitoring.

ix)               A contribution towards construction training for Hillingdon

residents in the sum of £2,500 for every £1 million of construction cost or a construction training scheme to be delivered on site during the construction phase of the development.

x)                 That the Applicant enters into a section 278 agreement under the High Ways Act 1980 to provide highway improvements to the Botwell Lane/ Church Road junction. Furthermore, that a detailed design and modelling be approved by the Local Planning Authority and Transport for London (if the junction is to be signalised) and that pedestrian crossing facilities on Church Road and Botwell Lane should be provided.

xi)               A total of 5% of the total cash contributions secured towards the management and monitoring of the resulting agreement.

xii)             The 20 public car parking spaces (identified on drawing no.2009D25/P/04) shall remain available for use by members of the public in perpetuity.

2.         That the Applicant meets the Council’s reasonable costs in the

preparation of the Statement of Intent and any abortive work as a result of the agreement not being completed.

3.         The purchaser of the Council’s interest in the land is to meet  ...  view the full minutes text for item 7.

Part retrospective change of use from Class B8 (Storage and Distribution) to use as a higher educational college.  (Deferred from Central & South Committee 06/03/2012.)

Recommendation : Approval

Part retrospective change of use from Class B8 (Storage and Distribution) to use as a higher educational college.  (Deferred from Central & South Committee 06/03/2012).

In introducing the report, officers directed the Committee to page 157 paragraph 22 of the report to note that the third line after the word “relative” should read “need of…”

In accordance with the Council’s Constitution a representative of the petitioners addressed the meeting in support of the proposal.  The agent also spoke in support of the application.

The petitioner made the following points in support of the application:

• Members had attended a site visit in April 2012
• The courses provided at graduate levels by the college were accredited with the appropriate professional and educational examination bodies
• The college also provided leadership development programmes and was proactive in helping young people to secure employment
• The college worked closely with local businesses, Universities and Colleges Admissions Service (UCAS), and Children’s Learning company to support its students.

Members asked the petitioner about the number of home (UK passport) students that were from the local area.  The petitioner responded that a maximum of up to 200 students who attended the college were home students and were from the local area.

In response to a question as to what improvements/changes had been made regarding disable access to the building since the application was deferred in Mach 2012, the petitioner responded that a company had conducted a survey and an order had been placed for equipment but no changes had yet been made.

The agent made the following points in support of the proposal:

• The application had been re-submitted as the three reasons for the previous refusal had been addressed
• Had made their best efforts to amend the plans, such as widening doors as quickly as possible
• Members of the Committee had attended a site visit
• Had met with Planning officers and the Access officer regarding the issue of disable access
• The recently published National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF)  supported the proposal which complied with disabled requirements
• Considered that the proposal was a positive scheme.

A Member stated that the application had been previously refused for three reasons and suggested that the concerns in the previously refused scheme had not been addressed. The issue of the proposed development being located in an established Industrial Business Area was seen as a particular concern, as Members failed to see how with 200 local students, the parking proposal would work in a crowded area which did not already have adequate parking. Members noted that the applicant intended to change from mainly overseas students to mainly local students which may have an even greater impact on parking.

A Member reiterated that it was clear that the site of the proposed development was within a very long standing business area which should not be compromised.

The Committee indicated that the IBA should be retained and expressed their regret that the proposed development was sited in the heart of this area.

Members stressed that no  ...  view the full minutes text for item 8.

Expansion of snow base to provide additional covered storage and parking for snow vehicles, a welfare and maintenance building and diesel and de-icer storage (Consultation Under Part 18 of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 1995).

Recommendation : No Objection raised.

Expansion of snow base to provide additional covered storage and parking for snow vehicles, a welfare and maintenance building and diesel and de-icer storage (Consultation Under Part 18 of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 1995).

The recommendation was moved, seconded and on being put to the vote was agreed. 

Resolved – That the Committee raised no objection.

Reserved matters (appearance and landscaping) in compliance with conditions 2 and 3 for Phase 1, third application (10 dwellings to north of site) of planning permission ref: 5107/APP/2009/2348 dated 01/10/2010: Proposed mixed-use redevelopment comprising: 773 dwellings; Class D1 Primary Healthcare facility including room for joint community use; Class C2 Nursing Home (up to 3630sqm gea); Classes A1-A3 Shop units to complement Mulberry Parade (up to 185sqm gea, depending on size of Primary Healthcare facility); Class B1  Business units including site management office (up to 185sqm gea); Energy Centre (up to 220sqm gea) with combined heat and power unit; foul water pumping station; associated access roads from Porters Way (and excluding all access including pedestrian and bicycle access from Rutters Close); 1085 car parking spaces; cycle parking; public open space areas; cycleways and footpaths; and landscaping works.

Recommendation : Approval

Reserved matters (appearance and landscaping) in compliance with conditions 2 and 3 for Phase 1, third application (10 dwellings to north of site) of planning permission ref: 5107/APP/2009/2348 dated 01/10/2010: Proposed mixed-use redevelopment comprising: 773 dwellings; Class D1 Primary Healthcare facility including room for joint community use; Class C2 Nursing Home (up to 3630sqm gea); Classes A1-A3 Shop units to complement Mulberry Parade (up to 185sqm gea, depending on size of Primary Healthcare facility); Class B1  Business units including site management office (up to 185sqm gea); Energy Centre (up to 220sqm gea) with combined heat and power unit; foul water pumping station; associated access roads from Porters Way (and excluding all access including pedestrian and bicycle access from Rutters Close); 1085 car parking spaces; cycle parking; public open space areas; cycleways and footpaths; and landscaping works.

Officers drew the Committee’s attention to note the amendments in the Addendum circulated at the meeting.

The recommendation for approval was moved, seconded and on being put to the vote was agreed. 

Resolved – That the application be approved subject to the conditions and informatives set out in the officer’s report and the changes in the Addendum.

Reserved matters (appearance and landscaping) in compliance with conditions 2 and 3 for Phase 2, fifth (final phase 2) application ('Block E' comprising 88 residential units)  of planning permission ref: 5107/APP/2009/2348 dated 01/10/2010: Proposed mixed-use redevelopment comprising: 773 dwellings; Class D1 Primary Healthcare facility including room for joint community use; Class C2 Nursing Home (up to 3630sqm gea); Classes A1-A3 Shop units to complement Mulberry Parade (up to 185sqm gea, depending on size of Primary Healthcare facility); Class B1  Business units including site management office (up to 185sqm gea); Energy Centre (up to 220sqm gea) with combined heat and power unit; foul water pumping station; associated access roads from Porters Way (and excluding all access including pedestrian and bicycle access from Rutters Close); 1085 car parking spaces; cycle parking; public open space areas; cycleways and footpaths; and landscaping works.

Recommendation : Approval

Reserved matters (appearance and landscaping) in compliance with conditions 2 and 3 for Phase 2, fifth (final phase 2) application ('Block E' comprising 88 residential units)  of planning permission ref: 5107/APP/2009/2348 dated 01/10/2010: Proposed mixed-use redevelopment comprising: 773 dwellings; Class D1 Primary Healthcare facility including room for joint community use; Class C2 Nursing Home (up to 3630sqm gea); Classes A1-A3 Shop units to complement Mulberry Parade (up to 185sqm gea, depending on size of Primary Healthcare facility); Class B1  Business units including site management office (up to 185sqm gea); Energy Centre (up to 220sqm gea) with combined heat and power unit; foul water pumping station; associated access roads from Porters Way (and excluding all access including pedestrian and bicycle access from Rutters Close); 1085 car parking spaces; cycle parking; public open space areas; cycleways and footpaths; and landscaping works.

The recommendation for approval was moved, seconded and on being put to the vote was agreed. 

Resolved – That the application be approved subject to the conditions and informatives set out in the officer’s report and the changes in the Addendum.

Demolition of existing buildings and erection of a residential building to accommodate 44 flats with associated landscaping and basement car park.

Recommendation : Approval subject to a S106 Agreement.

Demolition of existing buildings and erection of a residential building to accommodate 44 flats with associated landscaping and basement car park.

In introducing the report, officer’s advised that the schemes that had been previously approved and refused were not reflected on this application. The Committee was directed to note the changes in the Addendum circulated at the meeting.

In response to a query raised about overlooking on ground floor flats and adjoining houses, officer’s advised that those issues had been addressed on this site.

A Member commented that quality of living accommodation provided by this development appeared to be reducing and did not see how this fitted in with sustainable living when occupiers of the development would be required to use more electricity to create more lighting.  

Officers advised that these were the details that had been approved on appeal.

The Committee attached an additional condition to restrict the use of antennas on the building.

The recommendation was with the additional condition was moved, seconded and on being put to the vote was agreed.

Resolved

That delegated powers be given to the Head of Planning, Sport and Green Spaces to grant planning permission, subject to the following:

A. That the Council enters into an agreement with the applicant under Section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) and/or Section 278 of the Highways Act 1980 (as amended) and/ or other appropriate legislation to secure:

i)                    Affordable Housing provision in the form of 6 discounted open market units ( 4 x 1 bed and 2 x 2 beds) at 75% of Open Market Value.

ii)                  Education: to the sum of £126,741.

iii)                Health and Social Care: in the sum of £17,320.60

iv)               Libraries in the sum of £1,838.62.

v)                 Air Quality: £12,500.

vi)               Construction Training: £29,710.63 or a scheme to be submitted to and approved by the Council detailing how construction training will be provided to Hillingdon residents as an in-kind scheme.

vii)             Project Management and Monitoring Fee: at 5% or £10,405.54.

viii)           The management of air quality monitoring within the vicinity of the site to the sum of £12,500.

B) That in respect of the application for planning permission, the applicant meets the Council's reasonable costs in preparation of the Section 106 and 278 Agreements and any abortive work as a result of the agreement not being completed.

C) That officers be authorised to negotiate and agree the detailed terms of the proposed agreement and conditions of approval.

D) That if any of the heads of terms set out above have not been agreed and the S106 legal agreement has not been finalised within 6 months of the date of this Committee resolution, or any other period deemed appropriate by the Head of Planning, Sport and Green Spaces, then the application may be referred back to the Committee for determination.

E) That subject to the above, the application be deferred for determination by the Head of Planning, Sport and Green Spaces under delegated powers, subject to  ...  view the full minutes text for item 12.

Single storey detached building for use as a dry cleaning pod.

Recommendation : Approval

Single storey detached building for use as a dry cleaning pod.

In accordance with the Council’s Constitution a petition representative addressed the meeting in objection to the application.  The agent was not present at the meeting. 

The petitioner made the following points:

·        Operated a family business  within a parade of other small businesses, which were an integral part of the community

·        Suggested that Tesco  was attempting to kill-off nearby small businesses

·        Approval of this application would not only have a detrimental effect on the livelihood of the dry cleaning service provided as well as other business, it would also result in the loss of jobs for staff who lived locally  

·        The owner of a TV shop could not compete with Tesco’s prices and had to close down recently

·        A local optician business was currently struggling to remain open as Tesco was now offering free eye tests

·        The petition against this proposal was supported by many local residents

·        Suggested that empty shops created an urban drain which would be detrimental to the area

·        Stated that the petition was also supported by the Landlord who did not receive notification of the application.

Officers advised that the owner occupiers of businesses were written to and that they were satisfied that the provisions of consultation process had been fulfilled.

A Member asked officers what policies there were in place to protect small local traders. Officers advised that there were none.

A Member added that the proposed development was close to a zebra crossing and expressed concerns that as the report had indicated that the proposed dry cleaning service would not be operated on site, there was potential for the vehicles delivering and collecting the dry cleaning to lead to traffic issues.

The Committee expressed concerns about potential sitting issues of the proposed development which may impact on pedestrian safety.

Officers advised that there was a minimum of 2m foot path around the building with no site line and explained that there was a loading bay which was adjacent to the site where the dry cleaning would be collected and dropped off.

 It was proposed, seconded and on being put to the vote agreed that the application be deferred for Committee Members to make a site visit.

Resolved – That the application be deferred for Committee Members to make a site visit.

Variation of condition 3 of planning permission ref. 10605/APP/2005/3028 dated 21/12/2005 (Part change of use from selling and displaying motor vehicles, servicing and repairing motor vehicles to a mixed use for selling and display of motors vehicles, servicing and repairing motor vehicles and car valeting) to allow for change of opening hours to 8am-8pm on Mon-Fri, 10am-8pm on Saturday and 10am-6pm on Sunday.

Recommendation : Refusal

Variation of condition 3 of planning permission ref. 10605/APP/2005/3028 dated 21/12/2005 (Part change of use from selling and displaying motor vehicles, servicing and repairing motor vehicles to a mixed use for selling and display of motors vehicles, servicing and repairing motor vehicles and car valeting) to allow for change of opening hours to 8am-8pm on Mon-Fri, 10am-8pm on Saturday and 10am-6pm on Sunday.

This application was withdrawn by the applicant.

Variation of condition 7 of planning permission ref. 532/APP/2001/1858 to allow a temporary change of opening times to include bank holidays and extend opening hours to 11pm Monday to Sunday for the period 4th June to 5th June 2012 and 20th July to 11th August 2012 (Provision of replacement sports pitches (including new synthetic playing surfaces, erection of floodlighting, boundary fences and storage building, together with associated parking and access improvements (site 3)

Recommendation : Approval

Variation of condition 7 of planning permission ref. 532/APP/2001/1858 to allow a temporary change of opening times to include bank holidays and extend opening hours to 11pm Monday to Sunday for the period 4th June to 5th June 2012 and 20th July to 11th August 2012 (Provision of replacement sports pitches (including new synthetic playing surfaces, erection of floodlighting, boundary fences and storage building, together with associated parking and access improvements (site 3).

Councillor Brain Stead was the Chairman for this application.

The Head of Planning, Sport and Green Spaces withdrew the sentence which commenced with the word ‘should’ at the end of the fourth line in point 10, headed ‘Conclusion’.

Condition 1 (Hours of Use), last sentence, the Committee added ‘or public holidays’

The recommendation for approval was moved, seconded and on being put to the vote was agreed.

Resolved – That the application be approved subject to the

conditions and informatives set out in the officer’s report and changes in the Addendum circulated at the meeting.

Installation of 4 x flag and banner poles.

Recommendation : Approval

Installation of 4 x flag and banner poles.

Councillor Brain Stead was the Chairman for this application.

The recommendation was moved, seconded and on being put to the

vote was agreed.

Resolved – That the application be approved subject to the

conditions set out in the officer’s report.

Installation of Cycle Shelter.

Recommendation : Approval

Installation of Cycle Shelter.

The recommendation was moved, seconded and on being put to the

vote was agreed.

Resolved – That the application be approved subject to the

conditions and informatives set out in the officer’s report.

Change of use from Use Class A1 (Shops) to Sui Generis to be used as a Tattoo Parlour (Retrospective Application)

Recommendation : Approval

Change of use from Use Class A1 (Shops) to Sui Generis to be used as a Tattoo Parlour (Retrospective Application).

The Committee amended the additional condition set out in the Addendum (circulated at the meeting) by deleting the word ‘premises’.

The recommendation for approval was moved, seconded and on being put to the vote was agreed.

Resolved – That the application be approved subject to the

conditions and informatives set out in the officer’s report, and changes in the Addendum (and amendments to the Addendum).

Alterations to existing car park to provide an additional 33 x car parking spaces and 2 x coach parking spaces. (Deferred from Central & South Committee 14/02/2012)

Recommendation :

Alterations to existing car park to provide an additional 33 x car parking spaces and 2 x coach parking spaces. (Deferred from Central & South Committee 14/02/2012.)

Councillor Wayne Bridges was out of the meeting when the decision was made on this item.

The recommendation for approval was moved, seconded and on being put to the vote was agreed.

Resolved – That the application be approved subject to the conditions and informatives set out in the officer’s report.

Change of use from Class B8 (Storage and Distribution) to Sui Generis for use as waste handling site (Resubmission).

Recommendation : Refusal

 Change of use from Class B8 (Storage and Distribution) to Sui Generis for use as waste handling site (Resubmission).

In introducing the report, officers directed the Committee to the Addendum and asked Members to note the appended letter that had been received from the applicant in response to objections raised in the officer’s report.  The Chairman directed Members to read the letter, which had also been previously circulated electronically.

Officers explained that the application was a re-submission of a previously refused scheme and the applicant had developed a robust arrangement in accordance with the London Plan. The applicant had however applied for an Environmental Permit for a wider range of waste than that shown in the application. Concerns were raised about the proposed different types of wastes that would be sourced from different locations and the impacts of traffic transportation which had not been properly analysed. Although the applicant had indicated that they were prepared to limit the different wastes, the precise types and quantities of wastes had not been clearly outlined and no legal agreement had been put in place.

Members noted that the letter submitted by the applicant contained contradictions and did not resolve the Committee’s concerns.

The Committee amended Reason 2 of the reasons for refusal by adding the words ‘free flow of traffic’ between the words ‘safety’ and contrary’ in the fifth line.

The recommendation for refusal was moved, seconded and on being put to the vote was agreed.

Resolved – That the application be refused for the reasons set out in the officer’s report and subject to thechanges in the Addendum circulated at the meeting were noted.

Part two storey, part single storey rear extension involving demolition of detached garage to side.

Recommendation : Approval

Part two storey, part single storey rear extension involving demolition of detached garage to side.

This application was withdrawn from the agenda by the Head of Planning, Sport and Green Spaces.

Change of use from Class A1 (Shops) to Class A3 (Restaurants and Cafes) (Retrospective) (Resubmission)

Recommendation : Approval

Change of use from Class A1 (Shops) to Class A3 (Restaurants and Cafes) (Retrospective) (Resubmission).

The Committee deferred this application as the bin storage arrangements were unacceptable.

Installation of 3 internally illuminated fascia signs and 3 non-illuminated fascia signs.

Recommendation : Approval

Installation of 3 internally illuminated fascia signs and 3 non-illuminated fascia signs.

It was Moved and seconded that the application be deferred for Members to make a site visit and on being put to the vote, was agreed.

Resolved – That the application be deferred for Committee Members to make a site visit.

Change of use from Use Class A1 (Shops) to Use Class C3 (Dwellings) to form 1 x 2-bed and 1 x 1-bed self-contained flats with associated parking.

Recommendation : Approval

Change of use from Use Class A1 (Shops) to Use Class C3 (Dwellings) to form 1 x 2-bed and 1 x 1-bed self-contained flats with associated parking.

The Committee indicated that allocated parking spaces should be numbered according to the dwelling units and asked officers to amend the wording in Condition 9 (to make this clear) in consultation with the Chairman and the Labour Lead.

The recommendation for approval was moved, seconded and on being put to the vote was agreed.

Resolved – That the application be approved subject to the

conditions and informatives set out in the officer’s report, and Condition 9 was revised to read as follows:

‘The parking areas (including the marking out of parking spaces) shown on the approved Plans, shall be constructed, prior to the occupation of the development and thereafter be permanently retained as such and used for no other purpose. No unit hereby approved shall be occupied until parking allocation scheme has been submitted to, and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The allocation scheme shall include such measures including physical barriers such as bollards and management measures, as are necessary to ensure the spaces can only be accessed by the occupants of the units to which they are allocated. Thereafter the parking shall remain allocated for the use of the units in accordance with the approved scheme and remain under this allocation for the life of the development’.

Reason

To ensure that an appropriate level of car parking provision is provided on site in accordance with Policy AM!$ of the adopted Hillingdon Unitary Development Plan Saved Policies (September 2007) and Chapter 6 of the London Plan (July 2011).

The recommendation set out in the officer’s report was moved, seconded and on being put to the vote was agreed.

Resolved

1.                  That the enforcement actions as recommended in the officer’s report be agreed.

2.                  That the Committee resolved to release their decision and the reasons for it outlined in this report into the public domain, solely for the purposes of issuing the formal breach of condition notice to the individual concerned.

The report relating to this decision is not available to the public because it contains information which reveals that the authority proposes (a) to give under any enactment a notice under or by virtue of which requirements are imposed on a person; and (b) to make an order or direction under any enactment and the public interest in withholding the information outweighs the public interest in disclosing it (exempt information under paragraph 6 of Part 1 of Schedule 12A to the Local Government (Access to Information) Act 1985 as amended).

The recommendation set out in the officer’s report was moved, seconded and on being put to the vote was agreed.

Resolved

1.                  That the enforcement actions as recommended in the officer’s report be agreed.

2.                  That the Committee resolved to release their decision and the reasons for it outlined in this report into the public domain, solely for the purposes of issuing the formal breach of condition notice to the individual concerned.

The report relating to this decision is not available to the public because it contains information which reveals that the authority proposes (a) to give under any enactment a notice under or by virtue of which requirements are imposed on a person; and (b) to make an order or direction under any enactment and the public interest in withholding the information outweighs the public interest in disclosing it (exempt information under paragraph 6 of Part 1 of Schedule 12A to the Local Government (Access to Information) Act 1985 as amended).

The recommendation set out in the officer’s report was moved, seconded and on being put to the vote was agreed.

Resolved

1.                  That the enforcement actions as recommended in the officer’s report be agreed.

2.                  That the Committee resolved to release their decision and the reasons for it outlined in this report into the public domain, solely for the purposes of issuing the formal breach of condition notice to the individual concerned.

The report relating to this decision is not available to the public because it contains information which reveals that the authority proposes (a) to give under any enactment a notice under or by virtue of which requirements are imposed on a person; and (b) to make an order or direction under any enactment and the public interest in withholding the information outweighs the public interest in disclosing it (exempt information under paragraph 6 of Part 1 of Schedule 12A to the Local Government (Access to Information) Act 1985 as amended).

The recommendation set out in the officer’s report was moved, seconded and on being put to the vote was agreed.

Resolved

1.                  That the enforcement actions as recommended in the officer’s report be agreed.

2.                  That the Committee resolved to release their decision and the reasons for it outlined in this report into the public domain, solely for the purposes of issuing the formal breach of condition notice to the individual concerned.

The report relating to this decision is not available to the public because it contains information which reveals that the authority proposes (a) to give under any enactment a notice under or by virtue of which requirements are imposed on a person; and (b) to make an order or direction under any enactment and the public interest in withholding the information outweighs the public interest in disclosing it (exempt information under paragraph 6 of Part 1 of Schedule 12A to the Local Government (Access to Information) Act 1985 as amended).

The recommendation set out in the officer’s report was moved, seconded and on being put to the vote was agreed.

Resolved

1.                  That the enforcement actions as recommended in the officer’s report be agreed.

2.                  That the Committee resolved to release their decision and the reasons for it outlined in this report into the public domain, solely for the purposes of issuing the formal breach of condition notice to the individual concerned.

The report relating to this decision is not available to the public because it contains information which reveals that the authority proposes (a) to give under any enactment a notice under or by virtue of which requirements are imposed on a person; and (b) to make an order or direction under any enactment and the public interest in withholding the information outweighs the public interest in disclosing it (exempt information under paragraph 6 of Part 1 of Schedule 12A to the Local Government (Access to Information) Act 1985 as amended).

The recommendation set out in the officer’s report was moved, seconded and on being put to the vote was agreed.

Resolved

1.                  That the enforcement actions as recommended in the officer’s report be agreed.

2.                  That the Committee resolved to release their decision and the reasons for it outlined in this report into the public domain, solely for the purposes of issuing the formal breach of condition notice to the individual concerned.

The report relating to this decision is not available to the public because it contains information which reveals that the authority proposes (a) to give under any enactment a notice under or by virtue of which requirements are imposed on a person; and (b) to make an order or direction under any enactment and the public interest in withholding the information outweighs the public interest in disclosing it (exempt information under paragraph 6 of Part 1 of Schedule 12A to the Local Government (Access to Information) Act 1985 as amended).