Agenda and minutes

Standards Committee Hearings Sub-Committee - Tuesday, 13th December, 2011 10.00 am

Venue: Committee Room 4a - Civic Centre, High Street, Uxbridge UB8 1UW. View directions

Contact: Lloyd White  Head of Democratic Services

Items
No. Item

9.

Apologies for Absence

Minutes:

An apology for absence was received from Councillor Khursheed. There was no substitute

10.

Declarations of Interest

Minutes:

There were no Declarations of Interest

11.

Hearing Into Complaint of alleged breach of Members' Code of Conduct. pdf icon PDF 48 KB

PRE HEARING SUMMARY

 

1.            The London Borough of Hillingdon’s Standards Committee, Hearings Sub-Committee will meet on 13 December 2011 at 10am in Committee Room 4a, Civic Centre, Uxbridge to hear an allegation made by Councillor Janet Duncan that Councillor Anita MacDonald (the Subject Member) has contravened paragraphs 3(1), 3(2)(b) and 5 of the Members’ Code of Conduct which she has undertaken in writing to observe.

 

2.            The particulars of the allegation, as summarised, are that that, during the course of an exchange of email correspondence with Councillor Duncan, Councillor MacDonald made a libellous and untrue statement about her and also about a former Labour Group Leader, Rod Marshall, which she copied to all the Labour Councillors and the Group Support Staff. Following the issue of a statement of denial by Councillor Duncan Councillor MacDonald responded with a further attack on Councillor Duncan.

 

3.            Paragraph 3(1) provides that “You must treat others with respect”;

Paragraph 3(2)(b) provides that “You must not bully any person”;

Paragraph 5 provides that “You must not conduct yourself in a manner which could reasonably be regarded as bringing your office or authority into disrepute.”

 

4.            The membership of the Hearings Sub-Committee is as indicated on the front of this agenda.

 

5.            The Monitoring Officer is Raj Alagh. The Deputy Monitoring Officer and clerk to the Sub-Committee is Lloyd White.

 

6.            The Independent Investigator appointed by the Monitoring Officer is Mr Tim Revell who will be present at the hearing.

 

7.            Councillor MacDonald has indicated that she will not be present at the hearing and will not be represented.

 

8.            The Subject Member and the investigator have both indicated that they are happy for the proceedings to be held in public.

 

9.            Procedure – a procedure for the hearing is attached commencing at page 1.

 

10.       Witnesses – the Subject Member and the investigator have both indicated that they will not be calling any witnesses.

 

11.       Findings of Fact – A summary of the agreed and disagreed findings of fact is attached

 

12.       Independent Investigator’s report and appendices – attached commencing at page 13.

 

13.       Subject Member’s response – attached at page 5

 

Additional documents:

Minutes:

FULL WRITTEN DECISION OF THE HEARINGS SUB-COMMITTEE

DATED 13 DECEMBER 2011

 

THE LONDON BOROUGH OF HILLINGDON

 

 

SUBJECT MEMBER:  Councillor Anita MacDonald (not present)

 

 

COMPLAINANT: Councillor Janet Duncan (not present)

 

 

CHAIRMAN OF THE SUB-COMMITTEE: Allan Edwards [Independent Member]

 

 

OTHER MEMBERS OF THE SUB-COMMITTEE:     Councillor Phillip Corthorne,

Councillor Richard Lewis

 

 

MONITORING OFFICER: Raj Alagh

 

 

INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATOR: Tim Revell – Date of investigation report 17 October 2011

 

 

CLERK TO THE HEARING: Lloyd White

 

1.            The London Borough of Hillingdon's Hearings Sub-Committee met on 13 December 2011 for the purpose of hearing a complaint made by Councillor Janet Duncan against Councillor Anita MacDonald that she had breached the Members’ Code of Conduct (‘The Code’) which she had undertaken in writing to observe.

 

2.            The particulars of the allegation, as summarised, are that, during the course of an exchange of email correspondence with Councillor Duncan, Councillor MacDonald made a libellous and untrue statement about her and also about a former Labour Group Leader, Rod Marshall, which she copied to all the Labour Councillors and the Labour Group Secretariat. Following the issue of a statement of denial by Councillor Duncan, Councillor MacDonald responded with an even more vicious, unprovoked attack on Councillor Duncan in an email which she also copied to all Labour Group Councillors and the Labour Group Secretariat.

 

3.            Mr Revell, the investigator, decided not to call any witnesses.

 

4.            Councillor MacDonald declined to attend the Hearing. She was not represented and decided not to call any witnesses.

 

5.            Mr Revell referred to his findings and conclusions, as set out in his investigation report, and submitted that Councillor MacDonald, had on the balance of probabilities breached the Code of Conduct by sending two inappropriate emails dated 22 and 23 June 2011 respectively to Councillor Duncan and copying them to all other Members of the Labour Group and the Labour Group Secretariat. In Mr Revell’s view Councillor MacDonald had breached paragraphs 3(1), 3(2)(b) and 5 of the Code.

 

6.            Paragraph 3(1) provides that “You must treat others with respect”;

Paragraph 3(2)(b) provides that “You must not bully any person”;

Paragraph 5 provides that “You must not conduct yourself in a manner which could reasonably be regarded as bringing your office or authority into disrepute.”

 

7.            After considering the evidence set out in Mr Revell’s report and his oral representations carefully, the Members of the Sub-Committee accepted the findings of fact set out in the report and they also made the following additional findings:

 

·          that Councillor MacDonald had sent an email of apology to Councillor Duncan dated 11 October 2011 but that this apology had not withdrawn the allegations set out in the emails of 22 and 23 June 2011 or apologised for the sending of them in the first place.

·          that Councillor MacDonald had shown remorse for her actions but had not withdrawn the comments made.

 

8.            The Members of the Sub-Committee decided unanimously that Councillor MacDonald had, on the balance of probabilities, contravened paragraphs 3(1), 3(2)(b)  ...  view the full minutes text for item 11.