Agenda, decisions and minutes

Apologies for absence were received from Councillor Roy Chamdal, with Councillor Ray Graham substituting in his place, and Councillor Jazz Dhillon.

There were no declarations of interest.

No minutes were received.

None.

It was confirmed that items marked Part I would be considered in public, and items marked Part II would be considered in private.

Two storey building comprising 2 two-bedroom and 3 one-bedroom flats, to include parking provision, involving demolition of existing dwelling.

Recommendation: Approval

RESOLVED: The application was deferred.

Two storey building comprising 2 x two-bedroom and 3 x one-bedroom flats, to include parking provision, involving demolition of existing dwelling.

Officers introduced the report and noted the addendum. Members were informed that the application had been submitted in 2009, and the Committee resolved to grant permission subject to S106 agreement. The S106 agreement was never signed, and the Council no longer seeks education contributions under the S106 process, as this has been superseded by the introduction of the Hillingdon Community Infrastructure Levy. Councillors were informed that the current plans, including footprint and amenity space, do still comply with new planning standards.

The Chairman stated that building at the site did not commence until July 2015, and commented that the time frame between building and the resolution to grant permission may mean new residents or neighbours now live in the surrounding area and did not have a say in the original consultation on the application. The Chairman confirmed that a re-consultation could take place to allow any new residents to comment on the application and have their views heard.

Councillors confirmed that it was important for residents to have a say, and a proposal to defer the application for re-consultation with residents was seconded. When put a vote, this proposal was supported unanimously.

RESOLVED:

-        That the application was deferred.

Change of use of existing building to a house in multiple occupation (HMO) to provide 10 bedsitting units with parking for 7 cars (retrospective application for full planning permission).

Recommendation: Approval

RESOLVED: The application was deferred.

The item was deferred without any consideration from the Committee on the application or its merits.

RESOLVED:

-        The application was deferred.

Two storey side extension, single storey front extension, single storey rear extension and conversion of roof space to habitable use to include a rear dormer

Recommendation: Refusal

RESOLVED: That the application was deferred.

The item was deferred without any consideration from the Committee on the application or its merits.

RESOLVED:

-        The application was deferred.

Construction of two, three-bedroom houses, one two-bedroom house and related facilities.

Recommendation: Refusal

RESOLVED: That the application was refused, with additional reason for refusal.

Construction of two three-bedroom houses, one two-bedroom house and related facilities.

Officers introduced the report and noted the addendum, including an additional reason for refusal regarding the amenity space of the three-bed dwelling which did not match the Council's minimum requirements. It was confirmed that previous applications on the site had been refused, as the development was proposed in an area of special local character.

Councillors echoed the comments of the Hayes Garden Residents Association outlined in the report, and did not believe the proposal on the site was acceptable.

The officer's recommendation, with the additional reason for refusal, was proposed, seconded, and upon being put to a vote, unanimously agreed.

RESOLVED:

-        That the application was refused, with additional reason for refusal.

RESOLVED: That the officer's recommendation was agreed.

RESOLVED:

1. That the enforcement action as recommended in the officer’s report was agreed.

2. That the Committee resolved to release their decision and the reasons for it outlined in this report into the public domain, solely for the purposes of issuing the formal breach of condition notice to the individual concerned.

This item is included in Part II as it contains information which a) is likely to reveal the identity of an individual and b) contains information which reveals that the authority proposes to give, under an enactment, a notice under or by virtue of which requirements are imposed on a person. The authority believes that the public interest in withholding the Information outweighs the public interest in disclosing it (exempt information under paragraphs 2 and 6(a) of Part 1 of Schedule 12A to the Local Government (Access to Information) Act 1985 as amended).

RESOLVED: That the officer's recommendation was agreed.

RESOLVED:

1. That the enforcement action as recommended in the officer’s report was agreed.

2. That the Committee resolved to release their decision and the reasons for it outlined in this report into the public domain, solely for the purposes of issuing the formal breach of condition notice to the individual concerned.

This item is included in Part II as it contains information which a) is likely to reveal the identity of an individual and b) contains information which reveals that the authority proposes to give, under an enactment, a notice under or by virtue of which requirements are imposed on a person. The authority believes that the public interest in withholding the Information outweighs the public interest in disclosing it (exempt information under paragraphs 2 and 6(a) of Part 1 of Schedule 12A to the Local Government (Access to Information) Act 1985 as amended).