Agenda and minutes

Petition Hearing - Cabinet Member for Community, Commerce and Regeneration - Thursday, 18th March, 2010 3.00 pm

Venue: Committee Room 3 - Civic Centre, High Street, Uxbridge UB8 1UW. View directions

Contact: Gill Brice 

Items
No. Item

1.

To confirm that the business of the meeting will take place in public

2.

To consider the report of the officers on the following petition received

3.

The Sigers - Petition requesting the installation of CCTV Cameras pdf icon PDF 103 KB

Minutes:

Councillor Bruce Baker attended the meeting and spoke as Ward Councillors.

 

Concerns and suggestions raised at the meeting included the following:

 

  • Had lived in the area for the last 10 years and the road had previously been very quiet.
  • Cars had been broken into with wing mirrors broken off, windows smashed and walls knocked down.
  • A majority of the people living in the road were elderly and were afraid of the anti social behaviour currently taking place in The Sigers.
  • Residents were now putting cars away this is the reason there had been no incidents reported recently.
  • There was not felt to be any co-ordination between the Police and the Community Safety Team in relation to the number of incidents reported in The Sigers.
  • Disappointed with the report and the final recommendations put forward.
  • Meeting held in the afternoon as some residents not able to attend as they work.
  • Safer Neighbourhood Team does not work past midnight.
  • Provision of surveillance was not difficult as stated in report.
  • A lot of residents are not aware that the Community Safety Team exists.
  • There had been 14 incidents in 3 months, which was too many to be ignored.
  • The installation of permanent CCTV is justified due to the number of incidents that had occurred.
  • Consideration could be given to the installation of a CCTV camera for a trial period.
  • During a trial period residents would report all incidents to establish effectiveness of the camera.
  • Following a trial period the situation should be re-assessed to consider whether to keep or remove the camera.

 

The Cabinet Member listened to the concerns of the petitioners Ward Councillor and advised that he would be agreeing Recommendations 1 and 2 and amending recommendation 5.   Recommendations 3 and 4 would not be agreed.

 

The Cabinet Member stated that a temporary camera had previously been installed but had not recorded any incidents.  Residents should be able to expect peace and quiet and with that in mind recommendation 5 was to be amended to read:-

 

‘Officers investigate modern wireless temporary CCTV in consult with the lead petitioner, Chris Groom and Councillor Baker on the best location for the Camera.  That the camera be for an experimental period of 3 months with a report back to the Cabinet Member at the conclusion of the temporary period for a further decision to be made.

 

The Cabinet Member also advised that he believed there was merit in speaking to the Borough Commander to ensure that the Eastcote Safer Neighbourhood Team was aware of the problems in the area.   Control of the Police operations was not under the Authority’s control but a request for more input form the Safer Neighbourhood Team would be requested.

 

Officers advised the meeting that there was a process that needed to be followed before CCTV could be installed.  If after following the process and CCTV agreed it was hoped that a camera could be in place by the end of April.  In answer to an issue raised by the petitioner  ...  view the full minutes text for item 3.