Change of use of stables to cattery (Sui Generis) involving the removal of existing roof, raising of existing walls and installation of new roof, two storey rear extension to rear of existing building to be used as Use Class D1 (Non-Residential Institutions) for use as a nursery involving demolition of existing barn and part change of use from cattery (Sui Generis), single storey side extension to existing building involving part demolition of cattle yard and covered area, alterations to parking, and installation of vehicular crossover to front.
Recommendation: Refusal
Minutes:
Change of use of stables to cattery (Sui Generis) involving the removal of existing roof, raising of existing walls and installation of new roof, two storey rear extension to rear of existing building to be used as Use Class D1 (Non-Residential Institutions) for use as a nursery involving demolition of existing barn and part change of use from cattery (Sui Generis), single storey side extension to existing building involving part demolition of cattle yard and covered area, alterations to parking, and installation of vehicular crossover to front.
Officers introduced the report and drew the Committee’s attention to the changes set out in the Addendum.
In accordance with the Council’s constitution, a representative of the petition received in objection to the application was invited to address the meeting.
The petitioner made the following points:
In accordance with the Council’s constitution, a representative of the petition received in support of the application was invited to address the meeting.
The petitioner made the following points:
A Ward Councillor addressed the meeting and made the following points:
In discussing the application, the Committee sought further clarification on a number of points which included local wildlife and traffic related concerns. Officers confirmed that most of the soft landscaping was maintained through regular mowing and most of the vacant buildings were used on a regular basis. As a result, there was no significant evidence of there being any damage to the local ecology. In relation to parking at the site, officers confirmed that it was proposed that the car park would be situated on a cellular system comprising of gravel laid over plastic cells. Members agreed that the site required further investment but it was essential that an application was sympathetic to the site.
The recommendation as stated in the report was moved, seconded and on being put to the vote was unanimously agreed.
Resolved –
That the application be Refused as per the report, addendum and the following additional informative regarding ecology (final wording delegated to the Head of Planning, Sport and Green Spaces and provided below)
'You are advised that the Local Planning Authority would expect any re-submission to be accompanied by a habitat/ecological assessment relating to the site and existing buildings.'
Supporting documents: