Minutes:
The Sub-Committee gave consideration to an application for a new premises licence application by Staycity Heathrow for a new premises licence at Staycity Heathrow, High Point Village, Station Approach, Hayes UB3 4FL. The application related to the indoor area of the premises for the sale of alcohol, on and off sales and the provision of late night refreshment. The proposed hours for licensable activities were:
Monday - Sunday: 10:00 hrs - 00:30, with proposed opening hours of 06:00 - 01.00 hours Monday - Sunday.
Introduction by Licensing Officer
The Licensing Officer, Stephanie Waterford, introduced the application and informed the Sub-Committee that objections had been received from 3 local residents and that a petition had been received from a further resident. This petition had been signed by 68 persons and opposed the grant of a licence on the basis that local residents might experience nuisance or crime and disorder if a licence was granted. Residents were also concerned that if off sales were permitted this could also give rise to nuisance or crime and disorder.
The Licensing Officer confirmed that no representations had been received from the Police or other responsible authorities.
The Licensing Officer confirmed that the Officer recommendation was for the application to be granted but that it be subject to conditions, as thought appropriate by the Sub- Committee, which could be based on the draft conditions submitted by the Applicant.
Representations made by applicant
Mr Shield informed the Sub-Committee that the Applicant’s business was aparthotels in different areas of the world, which offered accommodation with a small kitchenette. The Applicant also had a food and beverage offering including the sale of alcohol. This was predominantly geared to clients staying in the Aparthotel. The Sub-Committee was informed that the Applicant wished to offer this service to non residents as well in order to try and involve the community in the premises.
Mr Shield noted the concerns of residents, but felt that these related to how the premises had previously been run. Members were informed that the licensed areas were detailed in red in the plans contained in the agenda, and that the only point of access to the premises was through the front door area. M
Mr Shield informed the Sub-Committee that the back door area was alarmed. With regard to potential crime and disorder implications, Mr Shield emphasised that there had been no objections from the Metropolitan Police.
The Chairman also stated that no complaints about the premises had been made to the Council’s Anti Social Behaviour Unit.
In response to a question from the Chairman, Mr Shield advised that the reason why the Applicant had sought permission for off sales was to enable hotel residents to take a drink from the licensed area to their room. After taking instructions from Mr Lee, Mr Shields confirmed that the Applicant’s Business Model was geared for the benefit of hotel residents and that their business did not wish to try and compete with nearby shops.
Mr Shield confirmed that if the issue of off sales was a concern to Sub-Committee, the Applicant would accept a condition which did not permit off sales, provided that the entire internal area of the aparthotel was red-lined to enable hotel residents to take alcohol to guest rooms.
In response to a further question, Mr Lee confirmed that a start time of 6 am was to enable breakfast to be served. The Sub-Committee was informed that this facility would be available to non hotel residents.
Mr Shields clarified that neither the consumption of alcohol nor the smoking of cigarettes would be allowed in external areas of the premises. All consumption of alcohol would be in internal areas and smoking would take place only in the front area adjoining Station Road.
The Chairman also queried whether the Applicant was prepared to participate in the “Challenge 25 Scheme”. Mr Lee explained that the Company's training was for “Challenge 21” as this was considered to be more appropriate. However, Mr Lee stated that he would leave this decision to the Chairman.
A Member of the Sub-Committee referred to a conversation she had had with a nearby resident that morning concerning this application. This conversation was described as a conversation in passing at a newsagent. However, after questioning from the Chairman and the Legal Adviser, the Member confirmed that she did not wish to place any additional information before the Sub-Committee.
The Legal Adviser emphasised that the Sub- Committee’s decision could only be made on the basis of the information contained in the report or which had come to light during the course of the hearing. All other information had to be disregarded.
The Sub-Committee noted that none of the objectors or lead petitioners were present to address the Sub-Committee. The Sub-Committee confirmed that the relevant representations would be taken into account and weighted when determining the Application.
Discussion
The Sub-Committee noted that the Applicant had sought to address the concerns raised by residents by amending his application.
Consequently the Sub-Committee agreed that the licensing objectives could be upheld by granting the licence, subject to conditions which addressed resident concerns regarding nuisance and disorder. In particular, the Sub-Committee agreed that conditions would be required to ensure that off sales did not contribute to any disorder in the area.
The Sub-Committee noted that the Applicant had agreed to remove the application for off-sales subject to the entire internal premises falling within the red-lined area applicable to any licence that may be granted.
The Sub-Committee also noted a number of conditions volunteered by the Applicant which were aimed at preventing crime and/or disorder. The Sub-Committee concluded that the removal of off sales, the extension of the red-line area and the conditions offered by the Applicant were suitable to address the concerns of residents.
The Sub-Committee noted that the Applicant did not currently participate in the Challenge 25 Scheme, but was advised that requiring such participation by the Applicant might be considered unreasonable. The Sub-Committee accepted this advice, but would nonetheless encourage the Applicant as a responsible business within Hillingdon to adopt the Challenge 25 Scheme so as to bring the Applicant into line with its competitors.
Closing Remarks
The Sub-Committee heard closing arguments from all parties before retiring to deliberate.
All parties were asked to leave the room while the Sub-Committee considered its decision.
THE DECISION
The Sub - Committee has considered all relevant representations made and in doing so has taken into account the Licensing Act 2003, the Guidance issued by the Secretary of State under section 182 of the Act, the Council’s Statement of Licensing Policy, the Licensing Objectives and the Public Sector Equality Duty.
The decision of the Sub- Committee is to grant the Premises Licence subject to the conditions:
9. Management shall carry out regular checks of all licensable areas in order to ensure that no illegal drugs are used or found on the premises. All illegal drugs seized shall be stored securely and handed to the police.
10.The premises shall operate a proof of age scheme and require photographic identification from any person who appears to be under the age of 25.
11.CCTV will be installed with recording facilities. Such recordings shall be retained for a period of 31 days and made available, within a reasonable time, upon request by the police and Council officers.
12.Prominent, clear and legible notices shall be displayed at all exits requiring the public to respect the needs of local residents and to leave the premises quietly. Patrons will be encouraged by staff to leave quietly and respect the interests of any nearby premises.
13. The door numbered EDP 04 shown on the map at page 76, being a fire door, shall be alarmed at all times in the same way that all other fire doors in the premises.
Supporting documents: