Minutes:
The Cabinet Member for
Planning, Housing & Growth considered a petition requesting the
introduction of traffic calming measures on The Fairway, South
Ruislip. The Lead Petitioner addressed the meeting and explained
that The Fairway was a residential road home to families and
elderly residents and was used daily by children walking to and
from a nearby infant school and a recently opened daycare nursery.
speeding had become an increasing problem over a number of years,
with the road frequently used as a cut-through route by drivers
seeking to avoid congestion on surrounding roads.
The Lead Petitioner highlighted that vehicles were often observed
to be travelling at excessive speeds, particularly along the
straight sections of the road, and some drivers were overtaking
dangerously. The resulting impact had created safety concerns for
residents, with parents expressing anxiety about allowing their
children to walk or cycle, and elderly residents feeling unsafe
when crossing the road. It was further noted that the constant
noise from speeding vehicles was affecting residents’ quality
of life.
Attention was drawn to specific problem areas, including at the
junction with Queens Walk, where vehicles were reportedly cutting
corners at speed, and along the section between Queens Walk and
Field End Road, where cars were said to accelerate significantly.
The Lead Petitioner advised that near misses had been reported by
residents in these locations. In terms of possible solutions, the
Lead Petitioner suggested that the introduction of raised islands
or speed tables could help deter speeding, noting that speed tables
provided a gradual rise that remained effective in reducing vehicle
speeds. It was acknowledged that speed humps or cushions might not
be suitable if The Fairway was classified as an emergency response
route. Improved road markings and clearer signage were also
proposed to remind drivers to maintain appropriate speeds.
The Lead Petitioner requested that updated traffic surveys be
undertaken, explaining that previous speed data had been collected
from pneumatic tubes placed near Field End Road, which they felt
did not adequately reflect vehicle speeds at the critical
locations, as cars were already slowing down where the previous
surveys had been undertaken. It was suggested that future
monitoring points be positioned further along both sections of the
road to provide a more accurate assessment of speeding
activity.
Residents had also
reported incidents of parked vehicles being damaged, believed to be
linked to excessive speeds, and noted that large vehicles parked on
both sides of the carriageway were creating visibility issues for
both drivers and pedestrians.
The Lead Petitioner confirmed that they were an active member of
the local community, including the Neighbourhood Watch and Police
Ward Panel, and that the local police team supported the petition
and shared the same safety concerns. In conclusion, the Lead
Petitioner urged that traffic calming measures on The Fairway be
prioritised to protect residents and improve road safety. vehicles
regularly travelled at excessive speeds along the stretch between
Queens Walk and Field End Road, with some residents hearing
speeding cars throughout the day. The Lead Petitioner said that
traffic levels had increased significantly in recent years and that
residents continued to raise concerns through local groups and
direct contact.
The Lead Petitioner advised that while some serious incidents were
formally recorded, many near misses and minor collisions went
unreported, including cases of parked cars being damaged. It was
felt that if all such incidents were recorded, the true scale of
the problem would be much higher.
The Head of Transport
and Town Centre Projects confirmed that any future speed surveys
could be undertaken in consultation with input of the lead
petitioner and ward councillors to identify suitable locations. The
Cabinet Member noted that the local police were supportive of
residents’ concerns and that their involvement would
strengthen the case for review. It was explained that any proposed
traffic calming measures, such as speed tables, would be subject to
statutory consultation with residents before implementation.
The Cabinet Member also recognised concerns about the layout and
markings at the Angus Drive junction, which could be reviewed to
assess whether improvements might reduce unsafe manoeuvres. The
Lead Petitioner further noted that school-related parking and
congestion, particularly near Field End Infant School and other
nearby schools and nurseries, contributed to unsafe driving
behaviour during peak hours. The Cabinet Member acknowledged these
points and confirmed that officers would take these factors into
account when assessing potential safety measures for The
Fairway.
Cllr Richard Mills, as
Ward Councillor, spoke in support of the petitioners regarding
speeding concerns on The Fairway. He noted that speeding remained
an issue on both sections of the road either side of Queens Walk.
Previous surveys had been undertaken, but residents had raised
questions about where the strips were placed. Cllr Mills suggested
that residents should be involved in deciding future survey
locations, as their local knowledge would help identify the key
problem areas. He also highlighted that The Fairway was used as a
cut-through between Victoria Road and Field End Road and that
existing speed signs were often ignored by drivers.
He added that, as the road was used for school drop-offs, safety
was a key concern. Options such as raised tables would need to be
considered carefully, given the number of private driveways along
the road. Cllr Mills supported further surveys and called for
transparency in how the results were shared with residents to
ensure confidence in the process.
The Cabinet member thanked Cllr Mills for representing residents
and agreed that the outcome of the survey and the end-to-end
process would be important to ensure residents saw tangible
results. He asked about police involvement, and Cllr Mills
confirmed that the issue had been raised with the local Safer
Neighbourhood Team. The police were supportive and aware of the
concerns but faced challenges in enforcement due to limited trained
officers and resources.
The Head of Transport and Town Centre Projects advised that survey
locations could be decided either during the meeting or later via
Cllr Mills. He explained that the survey tubes must be fixed to
lamp columns for security reasons, and he displayed a map of the
available positions. It was agreed that the decision on locations
would be taken away to allow wider resident input.
Cllr Mills also mentioned concerns around Angus Drive, where poor
driver behaviour and road layout created safety risks, suggesting a
physical barrier might be required to prevent vehicles driving on
the wrong side of the road. The head of
transport noted that around four or five survey points would be
appropriate given the length of the road and that both sections of
The Fairway would be included in the upcoming survey work.
The Cabinet Member for planning housing and growth thanked the Lead Petitioner and residents for their efforts in bringing forward the petition and acknowledged the seriousness of the issues raised.
Resolved
The Cabinet Member for Planning, Housing & Growth:
1) Met with petitioners and listens to their request for traffic calming measures for The Fairway, South Ruislip;
2) Noted the results of the previous speed and traffic surveys undertaken in 2018, 2020 and 2021; and
3) Decided officers should commission independent 24/7 speed and traffic surveys on The Fairway, at locations agreed with petitioners and Ward Councillors: and
4) Asked officers in the Council’s Parking Enforcement Team to investigate options to enforce against possible moving traffic contraventions at the junction of The Fairway and Angus Drive and to report back to him.
5) In addition to 4th recommendation Requested highway officers to undertake a layout assessment of the junction between Angus Drive and The Fairway with the objective of seeking to reduce the likelihood of vehicles entering the wrong section of highway
Supporting documents: