Venue: Committee Room 5 - Civic Centre. View directions
Contact: Charles Francis
No. | Item |
---|---|
Apologies for Absence Minutes: Cllr David Payne substitute Cllr Michael White
|
|
Declarations of Interest in matters coming before this meeting Minutes: Councillor Allan Kauffman declared a personal and prejudicial interest in item 6 ‘Northolt Junction, Civic Way Ruislip’ as he was assisting residents in depth with this application. He left the room and did not vote on this item.
Councillor Edward Lavery declared a personal and prejudicial interest in item 9 ’91-97 High Road, Ickenham’ as he knew the petitioner. He left the room and did not vote on this item.
|
|
To sign and receive the minutes of the previous meeting Minutes: The minutes of the meeting held on 6 April 2010 were amended for clarification.
Under tem 6, Swakeleys House Milton Road, Ickenham, Page 2 - under the points raised by the petitioner, the minute was amended from “Clause 1.7 includes a draft default position in relation to the Open House Policy. The owner should be encouraged to continue this should the ownership change”.
to:
“Clause 1.7 includes a draft default position in relation to the Open House Policy. The owner is required to continue this should the ownership change”.
The minutes of the meeting held on 29 April were agreed as a correct record.
|
|
Matters that have been notified in advance or urgent Minutes: None. |
|
To confirm that the items of business marked Part 1 will be considered in public and that the items marked Part 2 will be considered in private |
|
Northolt Junction, Civic Way, Ruislip - 66712/APP/2010/103 Track and junction improvements involving widening the existing up line embankment for 1.2km; stabilising the existing embankment; laying a second track South of existing up main line; provision of new junctions; replacing the existing single track bridge over Civic Way with a double track bridge; infilling redundant under bridge and ancillary works.
Recommendation: Refusal Minutes: Track and junction improvements involving widening the existing up line embankment for 1.2km; stabilising the existing embankment; laying a second track South of existing up main line; provision of new junctions; replacing the existing single track bridge over Civic Way with a double track bridge; infilling redundant under bridge and ancillary works.
66712/APP/2010/103
In accordance with the Council’s constitution a representative of the petition received in objection to the proposal was invited to address the meeting.
Points raised by the petitioner:
Points raised by the applicant:
Members asked the applicant for further clarification about the methodology of working in sections and for further details about night work. In response, the applicant confirmed that work would involve some blockades and require some weekend work. It was anticipated that work to stabilise the embankment would last 2 to 4 days in any one position before it progressed further down the line and that the longest work in any one location would last up to two weeks (but not continuously). The applicant confirmed that night-time working hours would be between midnight and five thirty am. The applicant acknowledged that work ... view the full minutes text for item 6. |
|
3 Pikes End, Eastcote - 18957/APP/2010/266 Front porch infill, first floor side extension and alterations to existing side elevation.
Recommendation: Approval
Minutes: Front porch infill, first floor side extension and alterations to existing side elevation.
18957/APP/2010/266
In accordance with the Council’s constitution a representative of the petition received in objection to the proposal was invited to address the meeting.
Points raised by the petitioner:
Points raised by a representative of the Eastcote Village Area Conservation Panel:
Points raised by the applicant:
A Ward Councillor addressed the meeting in support of the petitioners objecting and raised the following points:
|
|
The Ferns, Withy Lane, Ruislip - 6885/APP/2009/2650 Demolition of existing industrial building and erection of a block of 5 flats with associated parking (outline application).
Recommendation: Refusal
Minutes: Demolition of existing industrial building and erection of a block of 5 flats with associated parking (outline application).
6885/APP/2009/2650
In accordance with the Council’s constitution a representative of the petition received in support of the proposal was invited to address the meeting.
Points raised by the petitioner:
Two Ward Councillors addressed the meeting in support of the petitioners and raised the following points:
Members asked officers to clarify the density calculations for habitable rooms raised by both the petitioner and Ward Councillors. In response, officers explained the report used the standard calculation whereby any room over 20m squared was counted as two habitable rooms. In addition to density considerations, officers made it clear that the application also did not comply on amenity or distance from the boundary issues. During the course of discussions, Members raised the lack car parking space as an obstacle to the proposal and asked whether there had been any pre-application discussions with the applicant. Officers confirmed that no discussions had taken place.
On the basis that there was no seconder for refusal, it was moved, seconded and agreed that the application be brought back to a future Committee and to ask officers to incorporate further information on density calculations and specifically information on how many London Boroughs adopt the same density standards.
Resolved –
That the application be Deferred.
|
|
91-97 High Road, Ickenham - 14964/APP/2009/896 Change of use of first and second floors from Class B2 industrial use to 4 four-bedroom flats with side/rear external access staircase and rear first floor walkway and installation of new rear first floor walkway and staircase (Part Retrospective Application).
Recommendation: Refusal
Minutes: Change of use of first and second floors from Class B2 industrial use to 4 four-bedroom flats with side/rear external access staircase and rear first floor walkway and installation of new rear first floor walkway and staircase (Part Retrospective Application).
14964/APP/2009/896
In accordance with the Council’s constitution representatives of the two petitions received in objection to the proposal were invited to address the meeting.
Points raised by the petitioners:
The applicant / agent was not present at the meeting.
Two Ward Councillors addressed the meeting in support of the petitioners objecting and raised the following points:
It was moved and seconded that the application be refused on the reasons set out in the report and the Addendum. On being put to the vote refusal was unanimously agreed.
Resolved – That the application be Refused for the reasons as set out in the report and Addendum. |
|
41 Rushdene Road, Eastcote - 51162/APP/2010/247 Single storey rear extension with glass panelling to rear.
Recommendation: Refusal Minutes: Single storey rear extension with glass panelling to rear.
51162/APP/2010/247
The recommendation for Refusal was moved, seconded and on being put to the vote was agreed.
Resolved – That the application be Refused as set out in the officer’s report.
|
|
41 Rushdene Road, Eastcote - 51162/APP/2010/246 Single storey rear extension.
Recommendation: Refusal Minutes: Single storey rear extension.
51162/APP/2010/246
The recommendation for Refusal was moved, seconded and on being put to the vote was agreed.
Resolved – That the application be Refused as set out in the officer’s report.
|
|
9 Burwood Avenue, Eastcote - 41436/APP/2008/49 Elevational alterations to side and rear elevations, involving the installation of 2 side windows, and increase in width of the rear element of the single storey part side extension by 700mm and replacement of its mono-pitch roof with a dummy-pitch roof, of planning permission ref. 41436/APP/2004/936 dated 07/10/2004: Erection of a part two storey, part single storey side extension and installation of a new vehicular crossover.
Recommendation: Approval Minutes: Elevational alterations to side and rear elevations, involving the installation of 2 side windows, and increase in width of the rear element of the single storey part side extension by 700mm and replacement of its mono-pitch roof with a dummy-pitch roof, of planning permission ref. 41436/APP/2004/936 dated 07/10/2004: Erection of a part two storey, part single storey side extension and installation of a new vehicular crossover.
41436/APP/2008/49
The recommendation for Approval was moved, seconded and on being put to the vote was agreed.
Resolved – That the application be approved as set out in the officer’s report.
|
|
9 Burwood Avenue, Eastcote - 41436/APP/2008/3396 Front canopy extension (Retrospective application).
Recommendation: Refusal Minutes: Front canopy extension (Retrospective application).
41436/APP/2008/3396
The recommendation for Refusal was moved, seconded and on being put to the vote was agreed.
Resolved – That the application be Refused as set out in the officer’s report.
|
|
Any Items Transferred from Part 1 |
|
Any Other Business in Part 2 |