Agenda, decisions and minutes

None.

None.

James Rodger, Head of Planning and Enforcement, declared a non-pecuniary interest in respect of Agenda Item 11, as he was involved with the Cranford Park Heritage Lottery Fund through his role as a Council officer. Mr Rodger confirmed that he would leave the meeting when the item was determined.

James Rodger, Deputy Director of Planning and Regeneration, declared a non-pecuniary interest in respect of Agenda Item 11, as he was involved with the Cranford Park Heritage Lottery Fund through his role as a Council officer. Mr Rodger confirmed that he would leave the meeting when the item was determined.

RESOLVED:  That the minutes of the meeting held on 11 March 2021 be approved as a correct record.

RESOLVED:  That the minutes of the meeting held on 11 March 2021 be approved as a correct record.

It was confirmed that Agenda Item 6 had been withdrawn by the Head of Planning prior to the meeting.

It was confirmed that Agenda Item 6 had been withdrawn by the Deputy Director of Planning and Regeneration prior to the meeting.

It was confirmed that a corrected plan for Agenda Item 11 had been circulated to the Committee prior to the meeting.

It was confirmed that all items would be considered in public.

It was confirmed that all items would be considered in public.

Comprehensive redevelopment of the site comprising demolition of existing buildings to provide residential care accommodation (Use Class C2), restaurant, cafe and nursery (Use Class E) in buildings up to 7 storeys with car parking, landscaping and associated works.

Detailed Description: 182 units, together with integrated nursing care and associated communal and support services including ancillary communal, care and well-being facilities including a restaurant, cafe/bar and wellness centre/gym and a children's nursery.

Recommendations: Refusal (P)

The item was withdrawn prior to the meeting.

The item was withdrawn prior to the meeting.

Temporary roofing cover and associated works to the Canteen Building for a period of 24 months

Recommendations: Approval

RESOLVED:  That the application be approved.

Officers introduced the application for installation of a temporary roofing cover and associated works to the Canteen Building, for a period of 24 months, as part of the wider Nestle Factory site. It was considered that the proposed development would benefit the listed building until a permanent roof solution was established, and the application was therefore recommended for approval.

In response to queries from the Committee, officers confirmed that the use of asbestos and other materials was covered by informative 6, while the original permission on the site mandated that the site is to be used for community use only, and this application was not seeking to change the use of the building. Guttering was confirmed to be external, and the temporary guttering design would revert to a permanent heritage style following the 24-month temporary period.

The officer’s recommendation was moved, seconded, and when put to a vote, unanimously agreed.

RESOLVED:  That the application be approved.

Variation of condition 1 of planning permission ref: 12579/APP/2012/2366 dated 17/09/2015 to allow the continued use of land to the North and South of New Years Green Lane as an organic composting site  to handle a maximum throughput of up to 75,000 tonnes per annum of organic waste, for an additional  temporary period of one year (Section 73).

Recommendations: Approval

RESOLVED:  That the application be approved.

Officers introduced the report requested a temporary extension to planning permission 12579/APP/2012/2366, granted on the 17/09/2015, to allow a temporary extension to composting activities for a period of one year. It was confirmed that the applicant would address resident concerns through a future full application. The application was recommended for approval.

The officer’s recommendation was moved, seconded, and when put to a vote, unanimously agreed.

RESOLVED:  That the application be approved.

Deed of Variation to amend  clause 4 of schedule 1 of the S106 Agreement dated 21.12.2006 relating to planning application reference 2543/APP/2005/870 at Land S E of Uxbridge Lido, North way (Site E) & Adjacent to Adult Education Centre, Park Road (part site H and site L)

Recommendations: Approval

RESOLVED:  That the application be approved.

Officers introduced the report, confirming that the application was seeking variations to previous legal agreements, set out within new standard GLA wording. The recommendation was for approval.

The officer’s recommendation was moved, seconded, and when put to a vote, unanimously agreed.

RESOLVED:  That the application be approved.

Deed of Variation to Section 106; Clause 20 associated with planning permission ref: 4058/DT/97/1723 dated 14-01-1999 (Redevelopment of site for residential (involving demolition of buildings on site) (outline application); namely to include a Mortgagee in Possession clause for Nos 14-18 Rutherford Close.

Recommendations: Approve + Sec 106

RESOLVED:  That the application be approved.

Officers introduced the report, confirming that the application was seeking variations to previous legal agreements, set out within new standard GLA wording. The recommendation was for approval.

The officer’s recommendation was moved, seconded, and when put to a vote, unanimously agreed.

RESOLVED:  That the application be approved.

Erection of 2 x 3 bedroom houses, construction of a 27 space public car park, widening and improvements of the existing access road, improvements to the existing access to Cranford Park, provision of a new children’s play area and all associated external works (involving the demolition of the existing single storey building and removal of all storage units) (Amendments to access arrangements)

Recommendations: Approve + Sec 106

RESOLVED:  That the application be approved.

Officers introduced the report and addendum, confirming that the applicant sought revisions the approved scheme comprising changes to the vehicular access arrangements to the residents' and public car park, and a reduction of one parking bay to the public car park. The application was recommended for approval, with officers further requesting that the Committee approve the separation of conditions to allow the car park changes to be implemented separately from the work on proposed residential units.

The Committee suggested that conditions be further amended to ensure that access to the car park be monitored throughout the life of the development.

The officer’s recommendation, together with the change to conditions as set out, was moved, seconded, and when put to a vote, unanimously agreed.

RESOLVED:  That the application be approved.