Agenda and minutes

None.

It was confirmed that there were no declarations of interest.

It was confirmed that all items would be heard in Part I.

None.

INTRODUCTION

Lois King, Licensing Officer at the London Borough of Hillingdon, introduced the report and photographs relating to the application for the grant of a new premises licence in respect of Pepe’s Piri Piri, 3 Byron Parade, Uxbridge Road, Uxbridge, UB10 0LZ. An application was made for the provision of late-night refreshment Monday to Sunday from 23.00 hours to 03:00 hours both indoors and outdoors. The opening times sought were Monday to Sunday from 11:00 to 03:00 hours.

A background of chronology of events was provided to the Committee. Three representations had been received, one from the Environmental Protection Team as a Responsible Authority and two from Interested Parties.

Concerns were raised regarding public nuisance caused by noise and odour, litter, safety of delivery drivers and anti-social behaviour. Mediation was attempted and an offer to amend the operating hours was made by the Applicant. However, this offer was rejected by one of the interested parties, and no response was received from the other party who had objected to the application.

The Sub-Committee was invited to determine the application, considering all submissions both verbal and written.

APPLICANT

Mr Rahim Rashid and Mr Sadiq Gardia, the Applicants, addressed the Sub-Committee.

The Sub-Committee was informed that when an application for the late-night licence was made, neighbouring premises were reviewed to determine typical operating hours. It was observed that several nearby establishments, including those serving alcohol and offering shisha, were permitted to operate until 2:00 - 4:00 in the morning.

Efforts were made to minimise environmental impact by investing £30,000 in ESP systems designed to reduce noise and odour. Additional measures were implemented, such as private waste storage and improved cleanliness around the premises, which were believed to have reduced local disruption.

A total of £450,000 was spent on the shop, and although it was acknowledged that financial investment alone should not justify extended hours, the enhancements made were intended to support the application. It was noted that many neighbouring businesses did not have similar ESP systems.

The Applicant’s engagement with the Environment Protection Team was limited, as the feedback received was perceived to be subjective. Objective data was submitted and a willingness to renegotiate operating hours was expressed. It was suggested that nearby building works may have affected the noise report and a revised assessment was offered if required.

During Member questions, the Applicant was asked whether professional advice and objections from officers and residents would be taken into consideration. A willingness to work with the Council and mitigate concerns was affirmed. It was stated that objective data had been submitted where possible, and that efforts had been made to reduce environmental impact, including the installation of ESP systems and waste management improvements.

In response to clarifications about the noise report, the Applicant confirmed that a revised noise report could be provided if needed and the Applicant agreed to accept conditions on the licence if granted. It was emphasised that the intention was to collaborate with the Council and support the community.  ...  view the full minutes text for item 10.