Minutes:
Val Beale (Environmental
Specialist) introduced a report detailing the Council’s
actions to address Air Quality following the Committee’s
previous review. The report detailed how the Committee’s
recommendations had been built into the Council’s Air Quality
Action Plan, answers to questions submitted in advance, and the
impact of the Covid19 pandemic.
Recent information
received from the GLA had shown that before Covid19, air quality
was improving, thanks to the instigation of ultra low emissions
zones, though during the lockdown air quality had been seen to have
improved dramatically. For example, of the 455 schools within
London located within polluted areas in 2019, only 14 were now in
such areas.
Members asked a
number of questions, including:
Had
schools been made aware of the available travel plans, and how was
the Council incentivising uptake or engagement with the
Council?
The school travel
plan team work with all schools to ensure they were aware of the
help that is available in regard to developing school travel plans,
accessing pedestrian/bike training etc. In addition, the Council
has been offering access to air quality education packages, to no
idling assemblies and events, and for the planting of trees and
pollution barriers. Schools with significant pollution issues have
been targeted first. Post lockdown, no idling events and the air
quality education packages will be offered either in virtual format
or with attendance at schools, with social distancing in place if
the schools prefer. In all instances, progress and uptake of these
issues is dependent on having an air quality champion within the
school to really drive the engagement forward. Officers will
continue to find ways to work with the schools who do not currently
engage.
Idling vehicles has
been an offense, under the terms of the Public Spaces Protection
Order (PSPO), in place across the Borough. The use of the PSPO
allows for a higher instant fine than other
legislation.
Had the
Council considered setting up routes for heavy polluting vehicles
to reroute them from schools, etc?
The London Low
Emission Zone sets emission standards for heavy vehicles such as
lorries, buses and coaches when they enter the GLA. These standards
are due to be tightened next year. In regards to routes there are
various mechanisms for controlling routes such as the London
Councils’ Lorry Control Scheme. In addition, the Council can
implement controls via traffic management orders on a case by case
basis and recommendations can be made in regard to relevant
planning application; in all cases the success will be dependent
upon appropriate enforcement.
How was
the Council ensuring that air quality monitors were being placed
correctly?
Siting for monitors
was, at times, difficult. It was recognised that roads were the
source of most pollution but monitors had to be placed higher than
ground level to be in accordance with relevant DEFRA guidance. It
was understood that although the monitoring was carried out at
elevated levels if the nearby road was a significant pollution
source then the nearby users at ground level would be exposed to
higher pollution levels. Actions to account for this were being
used in neighbourhood schemes were applicable such as the use of
road-side planting to increase the distance between the road source
and any pedestrians/cyclists etc. GLA pollution modelling was also
used to focus actions on certain areas within the borough to ensure
measures were prioritised where the levels were the
highest.
Did the
Air Quality Action Plan include a strategy to upgrade the
Council’s vehicle fleet to low/zero emission vehicles, or put
pressure on the supply chain to do
likewise?
A new Climate Action
officer had recently been employed to review and deliver strategies
relating to pollution and air quality. It is likely that this will
include looking at all aspects of Council activity such as the
Council fleet in terms of climate change
RESOLVED: That the report be
noted.
Supporting documents: