Agenda and minutes

Executive Scrutiny Committee - Thursday, 27th May, 2010 7.30 pm

Venue: Committee Room 6 - Civic Centre, High Street, Uxbridge UB8 1UW. View directions

Contact: Khalid Ahmed 

Note: 7.30pm start or at the rising of the Cabinet meeting 

Items
No. Item

4.

Declarations of Interest

Minutes:

Councillor Anita MacDonald declared a Personal Interest in Cabinet Agenda Item 8 - Requirements for Additional Primary School Places as she was a Governor of Heathrow Primary School. She remained in the room and took part in discussions on the item.

 

Tony Little declared a Personal Interest in Cabinet Agenda Item 8 – Requirements for Additional Primary School Places as he was a Governor of Pinkwell Primary School. He remained in the room and took part in discussions on the item.

5.

Minutes of the meetings held on 15 April and 13 May 2010 pdf icon PDF 167 KB

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Agreed as accurate records.

6.

Exclusion of the Press and Public

To confirm that the items of business marked Part I will be considered in Public and that the items marked Part II will be considered in private.

Minutes:

It was agreed that all items of business were considered in public.

7.

Consideration of Any Call-Ins of decisions made at the Cabinet meeting on 27 May 2010 pdf icon PDF 71 KB

To hear the Call-In of any decisions made at the Cabinet meeting prior to this meeting or made by Cabinet Members, other Council Committees or a delegated officer and published within five working days of this meeting.

 

Members should bring their Cabinet agenda to the meeting.

 

Members should consider any other decisions published in the five working days before this meeting.

 

The purpose of this meeting is to decide whether to refer back any decision to the decision maker.

Minutes:

Members gave consideration to the Cabinet reports of 27 May 2010 and after careful consideration Members decided not to call-in any decision made by the Cabinet at their meeting.

 

However Members sought clarification on the following items:

 

Agenda Item 8 – Requirements for Additional Primary School Places.


The large increases in the capacity of schools suggests that there will be considerable stress on the management structures of these schools. What measures are in place to support these

Schools in this process?

 

[Subsequent to the meeting, officers provided the following response:

 

“It is recognised that implementing an expansion and managing a larger school will present challenges. The aim will be to ensure that the design of new and/or remodelled accommodation will provide improved learning and environments and other facilities (e.g. increased kitchen capacity) to support expansion. Building work will be managed to keep disruption to the school to a minimum. Schools that expand will receive an in-year budget adjustment ("expanding schools" funding). Support would also be available through the School Improvement Service or other appropriate ECS service.”]

What is the priority order for this programme of expansion of school primary school places?

[Subsequent to the meeting, officers provided the following response:

 

“It is expected that work on site will be programmed so that additional accommodation for the Early Years will be completed first. However, the position will vary from site to site, depending upon the accommodation that schools have already and upon site constraints The timing of building work would be discussed with each school.”

 

Agenda Item 9 - Review of the Local List of Buildings of Architectural or Historical Importance

 

Members asked that the Wards of the buildings on the list be re-checked as the first four buildings contained in the Hayes list on page 99 of the agenda are in Botwell and not Townfield.

 

[Subsequent to the meeting, officers provided the following response:

 

“Members comments have been noted and the list has been updated accordingly.”]

Agenda Item 12  -  Contract for the supply of a double base class unit at each of the following schools: Brookside, Rabbsfarm and William Byrd Primary Schools

Members asked whether this contract was related to the report on the requirement for additional primary school places and if so, how could this contract go ahead before the consultation period for key stakeholders had ended?
       

[Subsequent to the meeting, officers provided the following response:

 

The class rooms at Rabbsfarm are needed to accommodate the school's existing admission number (i.e. no expansion is involved). Historically, the school has not been full in all year groups and has not needed accommodation for 2 forms of entry throughout the school. As numbers are growing, the school now needs 2fe accommodation for all year groups. 

In relation to Brookside and William Byrd, the proposed statutory consultation relates to permanent expansions of these schools. In September 2010, both schools are admitting over their existing admission number (i.e. a temporary expansion) and a statutory process is not required. The need  ...  view the full minutes text for item 7.