Agenda, decisions and minutes

Major Applications Planning Committee - Tuesday, 12th April, 2016 6.30 pm

Venue: Committee Room 5 - Civic Centre. View directions

Contact: Jon Pitt  01895 277655

Link: Watch a LIVE or archived broadcast of this planning meeting here

Items
No. Item

62.

Apologies for Absence

Minutes:

Apologies for absence had been received from Councillor Jazz Dhillon, with Councillor John Oswell substituting.

63.

Declarations of Interest in matters coming before this meeting

Minutes:

There were no Declarations of Interest.

64.

Matters that have been notified in advance or urgent

Minutes:

No matters had been notified in advance or were urgent.

65.

To confirm that the items marked in Part 1 will be considered in public and those items marked in Part 2 will be heard in private

Minutes:

It was confirmed that all agenda items were Part I and would be heard in public.

66.

World Business Centre, 4 Newall Road, Heathrow Airport - 71487/APP/2015/4718 pdf icon PDF 166 KB

Erection of a four storey office building (Use Class B1) with basement parking and roof top plant (Outline application).

 

Recommendation: Approval + Section 106 Agreement.

Decision:

Resolved: That the application be approved.

Minutes:

Erection of a four storey office building (Use Class B1) with basement parking and roof top plant (Outline application).

 

Officers introduced the report, noting that the application site was located to the south of Bath Road, opposite the Marriot Hotel and was accessed via Newall Road. The site would otherwise be considered as being vacant and underused, although it was understood that the site was currently used for parking associated with the World Business Centre. The application site was not within a conservation area. It was within the Heathrow Airport boundary, within the airport air quality management area and also within the proposed Heathrow Archaeological priority zone.

 

The application sought outline planning permission for the erection of a four storey building. This would be located at the southern end of the site, with the main entrance being accessed from Newall Road. The building would be set back from Bath Road by approximately 5.2 metres.

 

The application proposed the provision of 160 car parking spaces, the majority of which would be located at basement level, with 20 at surface level. A taxi loading bay, cycle parking provision and motorcycle spaces were also proposed. The existing totem advert on the site would be removed as part of the development.

 

It was proposed that a new transport assessment and any mitigation required as a result of the works would be included in a section 106 Agreement. Some concerns had been raised regarding the potential for flooding to occur within the basement of the development. However, proposed mitigation work was considered to be acceptable.

 

The building would be used by a company that provided technology for the travel sector. It was noted that planning policy aimed to restrict development at Heathrow to use by companies that were directly involved in activities that related to the operation of Heathrow Airport. This would be achieved through condition 6 of the officer report.

 

Landscaping along the Bath Road was not consistent, with some of the setbacks to building frontages being substantial, while others were set back less distance than the 5.2 metre set back of the proposals currently under consideration.

 

The application was considered to be acceptable in terms of its setback and landscaping. The application was recommended for approval.

 

It response to a Member question, officers advised that it had been recognised that the plant looked excessive in its scale and massing. Further details, including revisions to the scale, massing and bulk would be requested from the applicant. The final appearance of the top layer of the building would be secured through conditions. The Council's Urban Design Officer had suggested that the roof plant was rather bulky. The proposals set out the maximum roof plant, but it was not envisaged that the plant would be as extensive on the final build. The applicant would accept a condition being imposed that required the roof plant to be smaller. The Chairman felt that this was not overly concerning given that the application site was close to Heathrow Airport.  ...  view the full minutes text for item 66.